4 ms·
Ok, so we could have saved 5 comments if you just answered „yes“ to my first question. The cable disruptions most likely aren’t real accidents but sabotage, cou
by echoangle 2y ago
Ok, so we could have saved 5 comments if you just answered „yes“ to my first question. The cable disruptions most likely aren’t real accidents but sabotage, coupled with plausible deniability explanations of anchor accidents. That’s why I was talking about intentional damage from the start. Read the thread again.
- MichaelZuo 2y agoI had assumed you already understood the basics before writing the first comment. Why do you think your questions or assumptions even make sense?