If Apple can do that then it's a problem with the law. You can't really make a law and then argue "we're angry that people are complying with what we said, not

If Apple can do that then it's a problem with the law. You can't really make a law and then argue "we're angry that people are complying with what we said, not what we meant to say". But then again, I wonder if part of the reason is that they can't make the law too prescriptive because that would create other problems politically (especially if it ever got pointed towards European companies)...