4 ms·
I've dealt with Packaging of Texlive for a Linux distro. My god, it was the worst experience I ever had. They should first fix this mess. Because of this mess e
by farslan 14y ago
I've dealt with Packaging of Texlive for a Linux distro. My god, it was the worst experience I ever had. They should first fix this mess. Because of this mess every distro at least has an outdated Texlive.
- patrickg 14y agoEasy to say and hard to do. TeX distributions are getting more complex and much bigger, while at the same time providing a _much_ better user experience than a few years ago. TeX live for example has the "full" distribution scheme as default and the users always never have to install things found somewhere on the net by themselves. It just works for most people around us. As soon as you start splitting things up, it's hard for the users to follow. "We" keep getting questions from Linux users that "package X is not available and how can I install it? I've tried [many horrible things]?" The answer is usually "install package texlive-something" of your distro. For these users the user experience is worse than installing the full texlive. One really nice thing is with current texlive (> 2011) is that you can get updates between release cycles. This also makes (IMO) the user experience much better but is in contradiction to what most distros need.
- dfc 14y agoThis is why I am eternally grateful to Norbert Preining...
- farslan 14y agoI know him (not personal tough), but I read several documents and how-to's of him. As you mentioned I think he has really done an extra ordinary work.
- norbusan 14y agoWhat do you mean with "fix this mess"? I have done the first packaging of TeX Live ever for Debian in 2005, and I am responsible also for the "mess" upstream, so if you have complains, esp what you want to get "fixed", then be more specific!