2 ms·
Let’s pretend for a second that we absolutely, unequivocally, know and knew what would prevent transmission of COVID-19 [0]. It still does not follow that any
by amluto 2y ago
Let’s pretend for a second that we absolutely, unequivocally, know and knew what would prevent transmission of COVID-19 [0]. It still does not follow that anyone in the government saying “stay home” or “no non-essential travel” or “wear a mask indoors” is science. It’s policy. It may or may not be well informed by science and it may or may not be a good idea. Science might be able to determine how disease spreads, but deciding what to do with that information is outside the scope is most science.
[0] At least judging by what various branches of the government said and still say, this requires a lot of suspension of disbelief.
- taylodl 2y agoExactly. It's then on the public policymakers to inform the public how the policy was driven by science so that the public understands why the policy is being adopted. Policy answers what? Science answers why?