3 ms·
Thanks! I've seen some timing systems that are used in triathlons but the main problem was making a field that was 25-30 feet width but a tight spread (1 foot).
by lbotos 14y ago
Thanks! I've seen some timing systems that are used in triathlons but the main problem was making a field that was 25-30 feet width but a tight spread (1 foot). Do you think active would fair better in that respect? Last time I checked it seemed so but it also jacked up the price a bit. I know that for Olympic BMX they are using some type of active transponders but I can't think that any commercially available solution would be accurate enough. I assume they have to be doing camera checking too but for .000 second split times even a foot spread seems like a wide margin of error.
- 18pfsmt 14y agoGiven the granularity in timing (i.e. 0.000 sec) you are looking for, I don't think active would help; and, the tags are certainly more expensive, though reusable.
- lbotos 14y agoI'd settle for .00 but if I'm not mistaken the Olympic level reports .000 with some type of active transponder: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vb_UXJVK7iM http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vb_UXJVK7iM