> A.I. systems should be “doctor extenders,” Dr. Rodman said, offering valuable second opinions on diagnoses. Clearly not. These results show that most of the

> A.I. systems should be “doctor extenders,” Dr. Rodman said, offering valuable second opinions on diagnoses. Clearly not. These results show that most of the time doctors should be A.I extenders, offering valuable second opinions on diagnoses. It tells you everything that he's "shocked", and despite that shock, he still maintains the above keeping with the cognitive dissonance. Many of us who have enough experience with modern healthcare could see this coming from miles away, and would have seen the opposite result (doctors beating GPT on average) as shocking.