3 ms·
This isn't about "deserving". Clearly you still don't understand why monopoly prevention exists. It's about protecting the customer and the market. Yes, Nvidia
by HeavyStorm 2y ago
This isn't about "deserving". Clearly you still don't understand why monopoly prevention exists.
It's about protecting the customer and the market. Yes, Nvidia deserves their success - of course - but the concentration isn't good for the market. Companies exist to provide services and products to customers and should enjoy no special treatment from us, no matter how successful.
Also, any measure should be not as disruptive as to bankrupt the company or even put it in second place in the market. It's just about leveling the playing field.
- poincaredisk 2y agoIn fact, splitting a company has been shown to be beneficial to investors (both "halves" are usually doing well).