4 ms·
> Political ads are not convincing you to buy anything. My own (non-native) sense of the meaning attache to advertisement is matching the first one given in Wi
by psychoslave 2y ago
> Political ads are not convincing you to buy anything.
My own (non-native) sense of the meaning attache to advertisement is matching the first one given in Wiktionary:
> A commercial solicitation designed to sell some commodity, service or similar.
And from there, I can perfectly see how it might lead to a metaphorical use, but just aptly as in "politicians want plebeians to buy their bullshits".
> I'm closer to the rich end - like most people reading HN
Do you have statistics about that? By the very essence of capitalism, most people are despoiled at the bottom of the pyramid. I get that those winning the Silicon Valley lottery can end up with millions in their bank account, but how do we evaluate the percentage of readers of HN that are in the higher end of the incomes percentiles ?
- bluGill 2y agohttps://www.statista.com/statistics/203183/percentage-distribution-of-household-income-in-the-us/ https://www.statista.com/statistics/203183/percentage-distri... If you make 150k or more you are in the top 25%. You may not be rich but you are doing well. And that is just us income, throw the world at it and everyone looks good.
- psychoslave 2y agoI made 50k/year over the last two years, and that's the best I ever earned and I'm 40 old, living in France. I don't mean that I feel like the poorest person in the world, to be clear, especially if we can agree that money income is a poor proxy to measure how lucky we are in life.