4 ms·

I've also had a good experience using the 'perf'[^1] tools for when I don't want to install 'hyperfine'. Shameless plug for a small blog post about it as I don'

by usrme 2y ago

I've also had a good experience using the 'perf'[^1] tools for when I don't want to install 'hyperfine'. Shameless plug for a small blog post about it as I don't think it is that well known: https://usrme.xyz/tils/perf-is-more-robust-for-repeated-timings-than-time/ https://usrme.xyz/tils/perf-is-more-robust-for-repeated-timi.... --- [^1]: https://www.mankier.com/1/perf https://www.mankier.com/1/perf

vdm 2y ago
I too have scripted time(1) in a loop badly. perf stat is more likely to be already installed than hyperfine. Thank you for sharing!
CathalMullan 2y ago
There's also 'poop', which is a nice middle-ground between 'hyperfine' and 'perf'. https://github.com/andrewrk/poop https://github.com/andrewrk/poop
- llimllib 2y ago
  worth mentioning that it's linux-only