5 ms·
I once headed up content marketing for a small online publisher. It's a horrible job. You spend half your day trying to come up with clever headlines of an arti
by localhost3000 14y ago
I once headed up content marketing for a small online publisher. It's a horrible job. You spend half your day trying to come up with clever headlines of an article you've at-best skimmed and the other half trying to game traffic sources like reddit or fark or harassing other sites for a back-link. Content is too cheap. Supply is enormous (huf po alone does 1000 posts a day!). So, it's a race to the bottom with everyone producing crap. It'll eventually get so bad that a larger market will open up for for-pay content like the nytimes where you're guaranteed some level of quality. I think the traditional pubs who can weather the storm will do just fine once we reach this point.
- wslh 14y agoMay be what we need are new discovery tools? currently search engines, and social media are the main discovery tools. I think that the long tail is longer than it would "need" to be. There are excellent resources but difficult to find. I can think of new tools that can help: - Sentiment analysis for the masses implemented by a major search engine - Focused Web Crawlers - Tools to analyze authority in small communities. Currently authority rankings give information about high popularity
- sharkweek 14y agoreminds me a bit of the Ali G clip where he suggests a newspaper headline be "WAR BEGINS" on the front page, and "with a w" on the following page http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6H6OULO5R4Y http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6H6OULO5R4Y