2 ms·
I think it's the same thing, but I usually postulate DRY as semantically identical code, not merely syntactically identical. "Byte for byte equivalent" doesn't
by deathanatos 2y ago
I think it's the same thing, but I usually postulate DRY as semantically identical code, not merely syntactically identical.
"Byte for byte equivalent" doesn't necessarily mean it's a copy, if the semantics of it are different.