2 ms·
> It doesn't seem like it should be that difficult to understand. You've explained it, and I expect OP already knew what you explained. It's still pretty inco
by simoncion 2y ago
> It doesn't seem like it should be that difficult to understand.
You've explained it, and I expect OP already knew what you explained.
It's still pretty incomprehensible. It's very, very strange that folks would rather have a shitty, low-quality, godawful ending to a high-quality multi installment story, rather than having the storywriters just walk away from a proven-to-be-high-quality, multi-installment project they know they can't make a good final installment for.
- bigstrat2003 2y agoI don't think "I disagree with these values" is the same as something being incomprehensible. I personally think it's bizarre that people want to have nothing versus having something flawed. It is imo a great example of letting the perfect be the enemy of the good. To me, that is tantamount to saying "I would rather that this series be retroactively ruined than have a flawed ending". But even with all that, I understand your position. I disagree with your values (strongly!), but that doesn't mean I can't comprehend them.