4 ms·
Doesn't multiply area scale at O(n^2 * log(n)) ?? (At least, I'm pretty sure the Wallace Tree Multiplier circuit is somewhere in that order). So a 64-bit multi
by dragontamer 2y ago
Doesn't multiply area scale at O(n^2 * log(n)) ?? (At least, I'm pretty sure the Wallace Tree Multiplier circuit is somewhere in that order).
So a 64-bit multiplier is something like 32x more area than a 16-bit multiplier.
But what you say is correct for RAM area or the number of bits you need for register space. So taken holistically, it's difficult to say...
Okay, 64-bit FP is only like 53-bits and 16-bit FP is actually like 11 bits. But you know what I mean. I'm still doing quick napkin math here, nothing formal.
-------
We can ignore adders and subtractor circuits because they are so small. Division is often implemented as reciprocal followed by multiplication circuits for floating point (true division is very expensive).