4 ms·

Any examples? I'm in the same boat as you, and while I agree with the premise, I don't recall anything as egregious as the examples from the article: https://w

Any examples? I'm in the same boat as you, and while I agree with the premise, I don't recall anything as egregious as the examples from the article: https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/denial-of-evolution-is-a-form-of-white-supremacy/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/denial-of-evoluti... https://archive.is/H8hJw https://archive.is/H8hJw https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-the-term-jedi-is-problematic-for-describing-programs-that-promote-justice-equity-diversity-and-inclusion/ https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-the-term-jedi... https://archive.is/oMzz7 https://archive.is/oMzz7

bashmelek 2y ago
From my own impression back then, it was less political but more subtly ideological. Truth be told, I have my own ideology as well. Some things that I remember were an article that used a trolley problem of throwing someone in the way to save five as the “obvious rational” choice; and how the covers would often try to link entanglement or dark matter to consciousness. It was numerous little things like that.
setgree 2y ago
Bias might emerge as much in choice of topics to cover as in the tone of the coverage. On X, someone mentioned that Wired’s coverage in the past 5-10 years is striking for how little it discusses SpaceX, for example.