4 ms·
> really needs to be dealt with. Ignoring the passive voice, who do you suggest should deal with that, more precisely? And how do you suggest "dealing" with o
by paganel 2y ago
> really needs to be dealt with.
Ignoring the passive voice, who do you suggest should deal with that, more precisely? And how do you suggest "dealing" with one of the two nuclear hyper-powers in existence? (the other one being the Americans)
- tetrisgm 2y agoMaybe I should clarify that I am not in charge of any executive or military branch in the EU or NATO. I express my frustration with our leadership. If you're interested in how I think it should be sorted: the cables are between Finland and Germany. I think we start with Finland and Germany: - stepping updiplomatic pressure. - Expulsion of Russian and Belarusian diplomats. - Confiscation of Russian owned properties. - Freezing bank accounts. - Increasing tariffs on their goods - Reducing overall trade. - Increasing spending on national defense - And weapons production. - Increasing aid to Ukraine. The military leadership is seriously considering that Russia might push for the Baltics (meaning, the EU) within 4 years. The EU is not at peace with Russia. They are biding time for a war they need to prepare for.