3 ms·
Again, no idea how Google's supposed monopoly of web browsers is worse for the consumer than Apple's actual monopoly on iPhone browsers (they're all Safari unde
by ApolloFortyNine 2y ago
Again, no idea how Google's supposed monopoly of web browsers is worse for the consumer than Apple's actual monopoly on iPhone browsers (they're all Safari under the hood) and on App stores.
- JumpCrisscross 2y ago> no idea how Google's supposed monopoly of web browsers is worse for the consumer than Apple's actual monopoly on iPhone browsers (they're all Safari under the hood) and on App stores For the same reason proprietary cables aren't generally a monopoly problem: Apple hasn't been declared a monopoly. Google has [1]. [1] https://apnews.com/article/google-search-antitrust-case-59114d8bf1dc4c8453c08acaa4051f14 https://apnews.com/article/google-search-antitrust-case-5911...
- pcj-github 2y ago^This. Apple's lock on the mobile market is far worse for consumers. Break off the App Store from Apple, a company that would actually be valuable.
- elashri 2y agoThe DOJ is after monopoly in search space (and how Google is using chrome position to strengthen the search monopoly) not the browser space itself (Which is another monopoly but to less extend). People don't look into one product and DOJ are not naive to fall into this trap.
- ApolloFortyNine 2y agoThen pass a law that says all browsers must give a choice of search engine. I'm not sure your right though.
- elashri 2y agoAs you might know. DOJ is not able to pass laws for obvious reasons. They do enforce the current laws. Google is free to lobby for such law as they do with other things.