4 ms·
You're off by three orders of magnitude. My point of reference is that back in undergrad (~10-15 years ago), I recall a class assignment where we had to optimi
by vitus 2y ago
You're off by three orders of magnitude.
My point of reference is that back in undergrad (~10-15 years ago), I recall a class assignment where we had to optimize matrix multiplication on a CPU; typical good parallel implementations achieved about 100-130 gigaflops (on a... Nehalem or Westmere Xeon, I think?).
- NineStarPoint 2y agoYou are 100% correct, I lost a full prefix of performance there. Edited my message. Which does make the clusters a fair bit less impressive, but also a lot more sensibly sized.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]