3 ms·
Convincing deepfakes is a strong word. There are also people out there who think modern CG looks good, too. There will always be people who are ultra-sensitiv
by dham 2y ago
Convincing deepfakes is a strong word. There are also people out there who think modern CG looks good, too. There will always be people who are ultra-sensitive to things like this. So convincing might take 2x as long for some vs others.
- ruthmarx 2y ago> There will always be people who are ultra-sensitive to things like this. There are always people that claim to be...
- dham 2y agoTrue, but it doesn't change the fact that some percentage of the population is.
- ruthmarx 2y agoI'm kind of skeptical, just because I've seen people claiming things are CGI when they were not, or claiming the CGI was crap when it was fine. Reminds me of photographs asking people if photos were photoshopped or not and people generally guessed wrong about half the time.
- sumtechguy 2y agoThere is a musical artist on YT talking about this. He was sitting there listening to AI generated music. He said he could not tell and thought it was decent. His kid and wife however could and aske why he was listing to 'ai music'. That is a professional musician who couldn't tell. My wife can hear something she can not describe that makes her say 'it sucks'. Meanwhile I listen and think it is OK. It is like these things have tweaked that audio/visual hallucinations people see and hear like yannie/laural or the gold/blue dress. The corridor crew noticed something about AI generated pictures. They all seem to have similar lighting and chroma. So they have this 'look' to them (once you see it). That is because the pictures start off as a random noise picture and coalesce into a picture. So the lighting stays the same on just about every pixel.