> "Violent Disorder" is a specific offence listed in the Public Order Act. So the article should explain it. > The way it reads doesn't seem like it's "comple

> "Violent Disorder" is a specific offence listed in the Public Order Act. So the article should explain it. > The way it reads doesn't seem like it's "completely unrelated" at all. How is this related apart from the person sharing the same age and the town being the same? One is suspected of arson and the other of Violent Disorder? Does this add value to the fact check?