3 ms·

As backronyms go, this one is a winner. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backronym https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Backronym

• gxs 2y ago
  That article has to have some of the worst written language I’ve seen in a wikipedia article in a while. Just bad, unclear, convoluted explanations. Thankfully they provide a lot of examples - they should probably just skip to those and you’d be better off for it.
  • card_zero 2y ago
    I don't mind fixing it, but I can't see the problem. Which sentences annoy most?
    • gxs 2y ago
      Apologies man, I meant the Wikipedia article parent posed, not yours