4 ms·
"For instance, who here gets their technology or sports news from a national or local newspaper? Who looks to newspapers for the latest stock market performance
by gizzlon 14y ago
"For instance, who here gets their technology or sports news from a national or local newspaper? Who looks to newspapers for the latest stock market performance, restaurant reviews, or movie showtimes?"
Guess that question was rhetorical, but I'm going to answer it anyway:
I do! (well, maybe not movie showtimes)
There are many reasons I prefer an old-school newspaper for some things:
- I already spend every waking hour looking at screens,
paper is a nice break. Paper has some nice qualities too.
- Easier to read on a crowded subway than a pad [1],
no need to charge them, lighter, I throw it away when
I'm finished with it so I don't have to carry it around
all day
- I hate most online newspapers: 80% adds, shitty design,
seems to emphasise short stories to drive page views.
- Sometimes it's important that the news a "fresh",
and of course on-line wins there. But more often, the
stuff I read does not suffer much from being a few
hours old [2].
1 - I suspect.. they might be bigger but they are also soft and "bendable", and they don't break when that guy with the huge backpack turns and smashes it into you.
2 - Here in Scandinavia online news became popular early, and the newspapers have had more time to adapt to the threat/opportunity. I suspect this affects what they put in the paper editions.
(edit: formatting)
- dredmorbius 14y agoJust a quibble: the news:ad ratio for most print papers also runs about 20:80. There are exceptions for some subscription/newstand-sales driven publications (The Economist, the WSJ pre-Murdoch), but that's been a pretty solid rule of thumb for the past 30-40 years or more.