3 ms·
Per the article, the clock speed difference is much smaller than the ~4x performance difference (4.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz, i.e. 1.7x). So more than half of the perfor
by formerly_proven 2y ago
Per the article, the clock speed difference is much smaller than the ~4x performance difference (4.5 GHz vs 2.6 GHz, i.e. 1.7x). So more than half of the performance advantage of the P cores has to come out of the uarch difference (wider structures etc.). Meanwhile there will be other factors besides clock frequency, e.g. the P cores might use a different cell library than the E cores.
- cubefox 2y agoMakes sense. This would suggest the difference in power draw may not mainly come from the clock frequency, since (1.7x)^3=5x, which is significantly less than the 13.5x in power draw.