your argument has an invalid premise: "Models say X is happening." It's not the models that are saying X (temp goes up) is happening, it's empirical data. A be

your argument has an invalid premise: "Models say X is happening." It's not the models that are saying X (temp goes up) is happening, it's empirical data. A better argument is: - We observe X is happening - create a model of X happening - use model of X to predict X in the future - model of X might be or might not be flawed - meanwhile, X is still happening in the real world