4 ms·
Poems are not just about rhymes and beauty. I've generated a couple of poems by AI, and it never hit a quality a 10-year old could not write. Tht's nowere near
by pajko 2y ago
Poems are not just about rhymes and beauty. I've generated a couple of poems by AI, and it never hit a quality a 10-year old could not write. Tht's nowere near the artworks produced by Keats and Yeats. Indistinguishable from the work of a child - maybe. Indistinguishable from the work of a true poet - no way.
Also "Overall, our participants reported a low level of experience with poetry: 90.4% of participants reported that they read poetry a few times per year or less" WTF are we talking about?
- Ukv 2y ago> Poems are not just about rhymes and beauty The poems were rated on 14 factors, grouped into emotional quality, structual quality, atmosphere, and creativity. > I've generated a couple of poems by AI, and it never hit a quality a 10-year old could not write. A non-blind test of one person on a couple of poems doesn't mean all that much against an N=16340 study. > Tht's nowere near the artworks produced by Keats and Yeats. Indistinguishable from the work of a true poet - no way. The study compared to poems of "well-known human poets" - Emily Dickinson, T.S. Eliot, etc. It's true that the study's participants are not primarily poetry experts, but it did still find "none of the effects measuring poetry experience had a significant positive effect on accuracy". Plus, for the average person to prefer AI-generated poetry in blind tests is an interesting result regardless.