4 ms·
For what it's worth: I read on his blog that the original author of awesome-wm (j. danjou) stated in an interview that he used awesome with the default rc prett
by johnchristopher 14y ago
For what it's worth: I read on his blog that the original author of awesome-wm (j. danjou) stated in an interview that he used awesome with the default rc pretty much untouched (some people on the mailing list are heavily modifying it).
Moreover, awesome is "pluggable" into classic gnome 2.x
- zobzu 14y agoIve tried countless times but i can't satisfy myself with defaults on awesomewm. always have to tweak it and it takes a while. Incidently awesomewm configuration system is extremely powerful. But I don't wanna "waste" hours on that anymore (that is, all the wm config in general). If KDE brings too many troubles (the config is dead easy but it has other quirks, like memory usage, bugs, etc), I might just go back to the trusty window maker. Simple, easy. Maybe the way it should always have been ;-)