4 ms·
Who needs cybersecurity risks when you have an incoming republican administration hellbent on gutting regulations to the benefit of industry, a SCOTUS bending o
by aaronbrethorst 2y ago
Who needs cybersecurity risks when you have an incoming republican administration hellbent on gutting regulations to the benefit of industry, a SCOTUS bending over backwards to help them do it (stare decisis? What’s that?), and a HHS secretary nominee who wants to singlehandedly trigger the next pandemic or two.
- shiroiushi 2y agoRFK isn't going to trigger a pandemic; don't be ridiculous. Pandemics aren't caused by individuals. But, similar to not having any smoke detectors in your home when something catches fire at night, being in a pandemic with him running the health agency is not going to turn out well for you.
- aaronbrethorst 2y agoWhere did I say he's going to trigger a pandemic?
- shiroiushi 2y ago>a HHS secretary nominee who wants to singlehandedly *trigger the next pandemic* or two.
- aaronbrethorst 2y ago>a HHS secretary nominee who wants to singlehandedly trigger the next pandemic or two.
- shiroiushi 2y agoThat still doesn't invalidate my statement. He can't trigger a pandemic; he doesn't have the ability to engineer a virus, and I don't think he's going to find anyone to help him do so. Besides, why do think he wants a pandemic? The guy's a fruitcake, but I haven't seen any evidence that he's actively malicious this way.
- aaronbrethorst 2y agoI don’t disagree with your statement. I disagree with your assertion that your statement stands in opposition to mine and the accompanying pedantry.