3 ms·
It's motivated by the ideology of wanting a meritocracy - the idea that if you work hard you can reap rewards. Having some people in society that can sit at hom
by simonhorlick 2y ago
It's motivated by the ideology of wanting a meritocracy - the idea that if you work hard you can reap rewards. Having some people in society that can sit at home and watch the S&P increase while some have to work 50-hour weeks to make ends meet is seen as problematic.
- alchemist1e9 2y ago> the ideology of wanting a meritocracy - the idea that if you work hard you can reap rewards. and of those hard earned rewards investing them and then sitting at home and watching the S&P increase you mean? oh wait that’s problematic … let’s take those rewards away for “fairness” .. opps no incentives no meritocracy no prosperity
- stemlord 2y agoIt wasn't a judgement remark, "earned income" is what you call that which is not passive income
- alchemist1e9 2y agoWhat does the “to be fair” part of your sentence mean then?
- a96 2y agoAnd your influence, merit and worth are what you're paid in salary. That sounds sane.
- Izikiel43 2y agoI see this as a goal in life, not a problem