4 ms·
I sincerely commend the EFF for taking a stand to slow down the descent along the slippery slope of a 24x7x365 survelied society. At this point however, it is
by suprgeek 14y ago
I sincerely commend the EFF for taking a stand to slow down the descent along the slippery slope of a 24x7x365 survelied society.
At this point however, it is probably a safe assumption:
No matter what the NSA/NRO/CIA/DOJ or anyone else says, the US gov. in one form or another is monitoring every single Phone call, E-mail, Chat, Skype and any other form of electronic communication into and out of the USA. Also the location data that your cell phone leaks pretty much makes physical surveillance superfluous.
The Technology has been too cheaply available and the temptation too great for the truth to be anything else.
What the EFF should also be doing is launching a campaign to make end-to-end encryption the default everywhere. Every e-mail you write /Chat session/Skype session should be encrypted in transport for every one. Make the cost of doing this mass-surveillance so expensive that the Govt is forced to prioritize on the actual targets.
- ljlolel 14y agoYou presume that it's still expensive for the government to break AES.
- einhverfr 14y agoI think that's a reasonable assumption. But even if it is wrong and the NSA has a shortcut.... And even if that shortcut affects all implementations of all cyphers.... 1) expensive is still relative. Even if there is a short cut it may be only feasible to decrypt a small part of encrypted communications. So they may have to prioritize. 2) If everything is encrypted, they may still have to start somewhere. so yeah, it's not a bad assumption even if it is wrong. Speaking of which, https works with HN, not that this likely matters much.
- mindslight 14y agoWhat's the actual alternative to assuming that some kind of crypto is feasible ? Physics informs philosophy.