3 ms·
Slightly-longer commits to have never-broken commits... hmmmmmm.
by ervine 2y ago
Slightly-longer commits to have never-broken commits... hmmmmmm.
- Izkata 2y agoIf you hit a full second, that's just right back to the svn days where there was just enough friction people wouldn't bother to commit until everything was completely done, then the commit would often be too big to easily describe why things were done in the commit message.
- JoshTriplett 2y agoI don't think taking one second to commit is a problem. However, verifying that software builds typically takes a lot longer than a second.
- ervine 2y agoHuh, I guess we have different expectations. I really don't mind a few seconds even to know I didn't totally break things in a commit.
- keybored 2y agoSecond-order effects. Longer to commit means less commits which means more grab-bag commits which means less useful commits.