4 ms·
MediaWiki. Is there something wrong with the solution powering Wikipedia? It’s very simple to set up, and you can one-click deploy it on DigitalOcean for $10/mo
by movedx 2y ago
MediaWiki. Is there something wrong with the solution powering Wikipedia? It’s very simple to set up, and you can one-click deploy it on DigitalOcean for $10/month.
- jjmarr 2y agoMediaWiki doesn't have full WYSIWYG. The Visual Editor is nice, but doesn't support templates.
- bawolff 2y agoWhat do you mean by this? You can use templates when editing pages with mediawiki's visual editor.
- jjmarr 2y agoYou're right. I was going to tell you about what a nightmare infoboxes are, but my experience is clearly out of date. I guess I'm used to a large public failure killing a project. I'm extremely impressed by the experience now and I shouldn't have commented without looking into it more.
- Fabricio20 2y agoI gave MediaWiki a shot just now but it's seriously lacking Markdown support. Seems that there's a plugin for it but that's a no-go in the docker setup, would need to make my own container because it depends on some php package that doesn't come in the default image. Really a shame the docker setup isn't made to be extensions friendly.