3 ms·
> I'd like to know how anyone with an ounce of reality thinks we're going to reduce emissions substantially faster than we already are. Depends on what you mea
by cogman10 2y ago
> I'd like to know how anyone with an ounce of reality thinks we're going to reduce emissions substantially faster than we already are.
Depends on what you mean by "ounce of reality".
In reality, there's little that can be currently done mainly because of political policy. That's unlikely to change.
But, assuming policy could be changed, then there is actually quite a bit that could reduce emissions substantially much faster. Carbon taxes, better policies around railways (perhaps nationalizing and expanding ala india), more subsidies for renewable generation and battery production (perhaps funded by carbon taxes?). Stronger regulations on private vehicles (perhaps ban personal private ownership of large trucks and suvs?). But also trade deals and modernization efforts/investments with lagging countries to help them develop carbon free economies.
Now, I don't think policy change is likely. I do however think there are quiet a few policies that could significantly drive change faster than it is already going.
- rob74 2y agoWell, when even moderate gas price increases lead to either mass protests (e.g. https://apnews.com/article/colombia-protests-fuel-price-hikes-petro-82d56dd2b3b43e6551e91b6373b95a73 https://apnews.com/article/colombia-protests-fuel-price-hike...) or the election of climate deniers (such as in the US), policy is (unfortunately for the climate) not going to change fast enough.
- cogman10 2y agoA 50% gas hike isn't moderate. But I agree, it's something that'd have to be delicately done. Ideally phased in over time. I also agree, probably wouldn't be fast enough, just faster to significantly faster than what we are currently doing.