4 ms·
“High performers” in this article mean, to me, something like the 5% best. John Carmack is not a “high performer.” He’s in the vanishly small <0.001%. We all
by shermantanktop 2y ago
“High performers” in this article mean, to me, something like the 5% best.
John Carmack is not a “high performer.” He’s in the vanishly small <0.001%. We all know his name, and what he did and where he works.