5 ms·
Well, it’s a published Notion site, and Notion is a powerful doc creation platform. It’s not really intended to be a performant publishing tool.
by bicx 2y ago
Well, it’s a published Notion site, and Notion is a powerful doc creation platform. It’s not really intended to be a performant publishing tool.
- llamaimperative 2y agoOr a performant anything else, AFAICT
- criddell 2y agoIt’s a performant publishing tool (depending, of course, on your expectations) but it’s not a high performance publishing tool.
- TeMPOraL 2y agoIt's a performant publishing tool and perhaps even high performance publishing tool - in terms of user effort. What it's not is performant displaying the thing it published.
- criddell 2y agoThat’s fair. Viewers who don’t know what is serving the page will be disappointed. If you know it’s Notion, then it works about as expected which satisfies the definition of performant.
- hinkley 2y ago“Just because you are bad guy doesn’t mean you are bad guy.”
- hinkley 2y agoYeah the guy at my last place that was proud of serving < 2 req/s/core liked to use the world “powerful” too. It’s like it was his favorite word. And he’s on the short list of people I refuse to work with again. What a putz.
- bicx 2y agoWell Notion usually exceeds at least 3 req/s/core, so nothing to worry about there
- hinkley 2y ago<snerk> Well then that’s a relief.
- AtlasBarfed 2y agoPowerful, lightweight, configurable, performance. These are some of the biggest weasel words of IT. Every one of them has an implicit nature of a comparison word and yet the comparison or any sort of hard metrics are always completely absent in their use.
- hinkley 2y agoYarp. Infinite configurability means infinite validation time.
- zahlman 2y ago>a powerful doc creation platform Which, based on what I see in the rendered archive.is version, is being used to do nothing outside of the normal use of a standard Markdown-based SSG like Nikola or Jekyll. Not that doing more would be a good idea anyway.