3 ms·

Rewind and Recall also store similar data locally but maybe not only locally. And Recall/Rewind allow data deletion, they can retain the most recent data based

Rewind and Recall also store similar data locally but maybe not only locally. And Recall/Rewind allow data deletion, they can retain the most recent data based on time.

walterbell 2y ago
Thanks to PR debacle, Recall now encrypts the data in a VM, https://www.windowscentral.com/software-apps/windows-11/windows-recall-security-improvements-2024 https://www.windowscentral.com/software-apps/windows-11/wind...
- arkohut 2y ago
  If this is very important, I suppose I will implement encryption for stored data in future versions. However, I still have a question about this: it seems that lots of hard disk is already encrypted. After all, I also store a large amount of personal photos, documents, bills, and other important information on my computer, and I haven’t meticulously encrypted all this data again. Should I be doing that?
  - pstoll 2y ago
    It’s a question of risk. Full disk encryption targets a different threat model - disk encryption protects against someone grabbing your computer. Writing into an encrypted blob on disk adds a layer of protection against bad actors exfiltrating data by running code on the laptop. Overall I really am amazed that this sort of thing is now possible and appreciate a privacy-aware / local compute and storage version of it!
patrickhogan1 2y ago
Rewind and Recall are 2 separate projects and 2 separate installers. I use Rewind and I have several outbound network monitoring apps as well as local disk monitoring apps. Rewind does not send data offsite. Rewind does glitch sometimes specifically with audio recording which is extremely annoying. You go back to an area where you thought you had audio notes only to find you didn’t - even though you had audio recording turned on the whole time. It has something to do with meeting detection. Which is silly bc disk space is cheap just auto record. I do like the concept of an open source version and I will look into this.

Rewind and Recall also store similar data locally but maybe not only locally. And Recall/Rewind allow data deletion, they can retain the most recent data based on time.

walterbell 2y ago

Thanks to PR debacle, Recall now encrypts the data in a VM, https://www.windowscentral.com/software-apps/windows-11/windows-recall-security-improvements-2024 https://www.windowscentral.com/software-apps/windows-11/wind...

arkohut 2y ago
If this is very important, I suppose I will implement encryption for stored data in future versions. However, I still have a question about this: it seems that lots of hard disk is already encrypted. After all, I also store a large amount of personal photos, documents, bills, and other important information on my computer, and I haven’t meticulously encrypted all this data again. Should I be doing that?
- pstoll 2y ago
  It’s a question of risk. Full disk encryption targets a different threat model - disk encryption protects against someone grabbing your computer. Writing into an encrypted blob on disk adds a layer of protection against bad actors exfiltrating data by running code on the laptop. Overall I really am amazed that this sort of thing is now possible and appreciate a privacy-aware / local compute and storage version of it!

patrickhogan1 2y ago

Rewind and Recall are 2 separate projects and 2 separate installers. I use Rewind and I have several outbound network monitoring apps as well as local disk monitoring apps. Rewind does not send data offsite. Rewind does glitch sometimes specifically with audio recording which is extremely annoying. You go back to an area where you thought you had audio notes only to find you didn’t - even though you had audio recording turned on the whole time. It has something to do with meeting detection. Which is silly bc disk space is cheap just auto record. I do like the concept of an open source version and I will look into this.