3 ms·
This doesn’t answer any of the previous three questions?
by MichaelZuo 2y ago
This doesn’t answer any of the previous three questions?
- Joel_Mckay 2y ago"so they are free to ignore any ‘asks’ presented" Being hypocritical on top of flippantly disrespectful does not lend credibility to your assertions about detractors. Have a nice day =3
- MichaelZuo 2y agoHypocritical about…what? You need to actually write down the argument, if there is one…
- Joel_Mckay 2y agohttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Z4m4lnjxkY https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Z4m4lnjxkY
- MichaelZuo 2y agoTherefore…? Just linking a troll video with no explanation is pretty bizarre.
- Joel_Mckay 2y agoNot really, it just seems that way to someone heavily biased by idealism. I think you are feigning ignorance, and avoiding a simple question about backing up hilarious claims with a very low standard of minimal proof. You can believe whatever makes one happy. However, if you want upper level positions it usually means leaving for other firms, and or founding your own entity as a board member. Good luck, the world needs more dreamers. =3
- MichaelZuo 2y agoAre you confusing my comments in this chain with some other comments? Because this sounds totally incoherent in relation to what I’ve written.
- Joel_Mckay 2y agoIndeed, one has still failed to backup your assertion, and continue to engage in insolent off-topic trolling. The nonsensical detractors are a waste of bandwidth. Best of luck, this conversation should have ended with the first Straw-man argument. bye... =3
- MichaelZuo 2y agoThis still doesn’t make sense but sure… Bye then.