> zero evidence you mean except the original poster often implying exactly that in their articles or the personal experience of the commenter that nearly alway

> zero evidence you mean except the original poster often implying exactly that in their articles or the personal experience of the commenter that nearly always whenever they ran into borrow checker problems it was due to exactly that reason > There's never anything to improve on Rust, it's always user error / a skill issue. RFCs get accepted and implemented nearly every week, like in any language there is always a lot to improve the problem is that the complains of such articles are often less about aspects where you can improve things but more about "the borrow checker is bad" on a level of detail which if you consider the borrow checker a fundamental component basically is "rust is fundamentally bad"