3 ms·
How does making it harder for the user to extract information they are trying to extract make it safer for a wider audience?
by Zambyte 2y ago
How does making it harder for the user to extract information they are trying to extract make it safer for a wider audience?
- dbspin 2y agoAssuming that this question is good faith... There are numerous things that might be true, that may be damaging to a child's development to be exposed to. From overly punitive criticism to graphic depictions of violence, to advocacy and specific directions for self harm. Countless examples are trivial to generate. Similarly, the use of these tools is already having dramatic effects on spearfishing, misinformation etc. Guardrails on all the non open-source models have enormous impact on slowing / limiting the damage this has at scale. Even with retrained Llama based models, it's more difficult than you might imagine to create a truly machiavellian or uncensored LLM - which is entirely due to the work that's been doing during and post training to constrain those behaviours. This is an unalloyed good in constraining the weaponisation of LLMs.
- Drakim 2y agoThat's like asking why we should have porn filters on school computers, after all, all it does is prevent the user from finding what they are looking for, which is bad.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]