4 ms·
Clearly the military could spend less (every other nation does) but it would require changing foreign policy. For example the navy exists as "force projection"
by bruce511 2y ago
Clearly the military could spend less (every other nation does) but it would require changing foreign policy.
For example the navy exists as "force projection" - not coastal protection. Force protection is a foreign policy goal, not a "defense" goal.
The US military is not designed to fight on the US mainland, it's designed to fight on someone else's mainland.
Equally the medicaid budget could be way less. Other countries manage with less (for their entire population) but they dictate pricing, whereas in the US the suppliers dictate pricing. And they expect healthy profit margins at every point.
In general, the govt spends so much because the people charge so much. The govt has enormous negotiating muscle, but dares not flex it least they incur the wrath of "the free market".
- kohbo 2y agoWe spend more because it enables our influence around the globe. Other countries spend less because they do less and/or rely on our protection.
- deleted 2y ago[deleted]
- quickthrowman 2y ago> Clearly the military could spend less (every other nation does) but it would require changing foreign policy. Every other nation spends less because they are not the global hegemon. USD is in the position it is because we are the global hegemon. If you remove that by spending less on defense, USD strength goes down and our budget deficit and outstanding government debt start going up, weakening the country.