> Yeah, but it's just a theory that tries to fit this data. Doesn't mean it is correct. Yes. What else do you expect from science, or really from any human att

> Yeah, but it's just a theory that tries to fit this data. Doesn't mean it is correct. Yes. What else do you expect from science, or really from any human attempt to find truth? Are you just upset they don't include the caveat "subject to potential future evidence or better theories" on literally every single piece of science journalism? Are you upset that people do their best to make sense of weird situations and then tell people about their work, even if it's not absolute truth? What do you want to happen here?