4 ms·
> These tunnels are designed for 100,000 years Reminds me of: "Arctic stronghold of world’s seeds flooded after permafrost melts" (19.05.2017) https://www.th
by kvemkon 2y ago
> These tunnels are designed for 100,000 years
Reminds me of:
"Arctic stronghold of world’s seeds flooded after permafrost melts" (19.05.2017)
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/may/19/arctic-stronghold-of-worlds-seeds-flooded-after-permafrost-melts https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2017/may/19/arctic-s...
https://www.wired.com/2017/05/arctic-doomsday-seed-vault-flooded-thanks-global-warming/ https://www.wired.com/2017/05/arctic-doomsday-seed-vault-flo...
https://www.independent.co.uk/climate-change/news/doomsday-arctic-seed-vault-floods-permafrost-melts-svalbard-global-seed-vault-a7746526.html https://www.independent.co.uk/climate-change/news/doomsday-a...
"Perma" means not "just" 100000 years, but forever. The reality is different and unpredictable. Doomsday-proof architectures fail already nowadays.
- elcritch 2y agoYet there are places which have been geologically stable for 100's of millions of years or more. Change does happen but the risks can be made negligible compared to the various risks associated with other sources of energy. The damages of worse case nuclear waste leakage would also likely be very localized and manageable. Meanwhile fossil fuels have enormous environmental impacts across huge areas. Even solar and wind have large ecological impacts and aren't (likely) capable of replacing fossil fuels in time to prevent potentially catastrophic effects from global warming. It's all about weighing the risks.
- smegger001 2y agoit doesen't need to last forever though just long enough that it doesn't raise radiation levels a unsafe amount over the natural background radiation load. those elements are already present in the ground thats where we get them after all.