I appreciate that, and a good summary now and then doesn't hurt. But, for whatever reason, some recommendations come to be regarded as leading (and by SEO measu

I appreciate that, and a good summary now and then doesn't hurt. But, for whatever reason, some recommendations come to be regarded as leading (and by SEO measures, this one is leading quite a bit). My gripe is that it cements a certain way of thinking about how to best organise our stacks, to the degree that other companies are following suit by copying the 'radar' template without questioning its organising logic (why are languages/frameworks one category, for instance). That's not to say we cannot categorise tools and techniques or inventorise new ones, but that we should not take the opinion of one entity to reflect industry as a whole.