> Any evidence that benefits ARM and harm Qualcomm in this case has been completely ignored on HN. This feels like beating around the bush. Can you give examp

> Any evidence that benefits ARM and harm Qualcomm in this case has been completely ignored on HN. This feels like beating around the bush. Can you give examples or citations of “evidence that benefits ARM and harm[s] Qualcomm,” so that we on HN may avoid completely ignoring it? Otherwise it feels like we’re doomed to tilt at windmills in your view, but we have no way of knowing how to disabuse ourselves of notions you only vaguely gesture at.