4 ms·
Speak for yourself. If 'HN' doesn't want to read it, that's what downvoting is for. What makes Qualcomm somehow sacrosanct and immune from analysis or critiqu
by kjs3 2y ago
Speak for yourself. If 'HN' doesn't want to read it, that's what downvoting is for.
What makes Qualcomm somehow sacrosanct and immune from analysis or critique?
- ksec 2y ago>What makes Qualcomm somehow sacrosanct and immune from analysis or critique? None of what was written is new. And it is not Qualcomm is immune to analysis. It is the other way around. Any evidence that benefits ARM and harm Qualcomm in this case has been completely ignored on HN.
- aspenmayer 2y ago> Any evidence that benefits ARM and harm Qualcomm in this case has been completely ignored on HN. This feels like beating around the bush. Can you give examples or citations of “evidence that benefits ARM and harm[s] Qualcomm,” so that we on HN may avoid completely ignoring it? Otherwise it feels like we’re doomed to tilt at windmills in your view, but we have no way of knowing how to disabuse ourselves of notions you only vaguely gesture at.