3 ms·
> I doubt HN is interested in reading this. Especially half of the post are materials against Qualcomm. Considering Qualcomm's business practices of the past,
by aleph_minus_one 2y ago
> I doubt HN is interested in reading this. Especially half of the post are materials against Qualcomm.
Considering Qualcomm's business practices of the past, I would rather consider the material against Qualcomm to be beloved by a significant fraction of the HN readers. :-)
- ksec 2y agoYou would expect that. Except 99% of comments on the subject has been practically speaking "ARM is dead". ARM shouldn't sue Qualcomm.
- aleph_minus_one 2y agoOf course it seems that this hardball behaviour from ARM is likely a bad idea concerning its long-term business perspective, but I guess there is a significant group of people on HN which wouldn't be too sad about that because they hope this way RISC-V (which they love) becomes more widely used.