A lot of the comments here, and the article itself, are missing an important detail. The name of the product is "Kirkland Signature Sweet Cream Butter". The in

A lot of the comments here, and the article itself, are missing an important detail. The name of the product is "Kirkland Signature Sweet Cream Butter". The ingredient list on the package lists cream, it just doesn't have the required language "contains milk". Are there actual humans that are so deathly allergic to milk but somehow don't know what cream is? E.g. there is a comment in this thread that states: >"Would you toss your butter in the trash if the label left out one critical detail?" > yes, if that 'one critical detail' could in fact fucking kill me... I mean, imagine if someone had an allergy so allergic to milk it could "fucking kill them", are they somehow loading up on "Sweet Creamy Butter" and are then shocked that it contains milk?? I get why, bureaucratically, you want to have hard lines, so I understand the recall. I just think this article and some comments that there is actual potential danger in this case are laughably ridiculous.