3 ms·
TFA lists it as a quote. If the author made it up without taking that statement from the FDA that would be on the author. It's not very ambiguous. > The FDA
by phil21 2y ago
TFA lists it as a quote. If the author made it up without taking that statement from the FDA that would be on the author. It's not very ambiguous.
> The FDA has shared specific steps to help consumers handle this recall safely. First, check the product codes on your butter containers and compare them to the codes in the recall notice. If you have one of the recalled batches, the FDA advises not to eat it under any circumstances. Instead, throw it out to avoid any health risks. For any questions or possible refunds, reach out to Costco through their customer service team.
Edit: It is certainly curious that this looks like boilerplate language. I do wonder if it originates from an FDA spokesperson, or if the author copy/pasted a previous press release from Costco? Another article[0] explicitly states the FDA did not make any recommendations to consumers, but mentions the quoted statement and sourced it from foodsafety.gov as a general recommendation for "recalled products".
Looking like the author completely made up the quote out of whole cloth by copy/pasting boilerplate generalized language while implying it was a directly related to the issue at hand. Nice catch!
[0]https://www.palmbeachpost.com/story/news/2024/11/13/costco-butter-recall-issued-for-missing-contains-milk-statement-fda/76226713007/ https://www.palmbeachpost.com/story/news/2024/11/13/costco-b...
Edit 2: Can't reply directly due to ratelimiting - but yes, you are absolutely correct that the FDA has not urged anyone, or even explicitly recommended it be thrown away. The above was my independent sleuthing before seeing your followup. Others did far better.
I don't share the opinion this was "lazy telephone" by a reporter though - this was outright deliberate making things up to generate a narrative. Either there was a phone call/e-mail by a FDA rep these articles are quoting, or they are simply trying to generate outrage on purpose. There is no game of lazy telephone that can explain word choices such as "FDA urges" and the like to appear out of whole cloth.
- simoncion 2y agoIf you haven't visited that link I provided in the last five minutes, I urge you to do so. In that thread, a fellow has done some decent detective work. It looks like the article author (and/or editor) has played lazy telephone, and the FDA issued no such statement.
- pixl97 2y agoDon't worry the bullshit the author made up will be seen by 40 million people on tictok and not a single one of them will read the actual FDA release. The information super highway is a race to the bottom human ignorance.
- simoncion 2y ago> Can't reply directly due to ratelimiting... It USED to be the case that you could click the direct link to a comment to get the reply box to appear when the little "reply" link is refusing to show up. That might no longer be true, but it's worth a try next time you run into this. > ...this was outright deliberate making things up to generate a narrative. Oh, that's not an unreasonable assessment. > There is no game of lazy telephone that can explain word choices such as "FDA urges" and the like to appear out of whole cloth. If one site reports it, then other sites repeat it, that totally qualifies as "lazy telephone", IMO.