3 ms·
I think that is quite a bit of overreach. It's like requiring peanut butter to contain another label that says contains peanuts
by readthenotes1 2y ago
I think that is quite a bit of overreach. It's like requiring peanut butter to contain another label that says contains peanuts
- maxerickson 2y agoRequiring the extra labeling even when it seems redundant increases clarity for consumers and simplifies the rules. It's fine. At least, I doubt that you can write a set of rules for declaring allergens that is shorter if you do include exceptions to the labeling requirements. And I think there's a pretty strong argument that treating the ingredients and allergens as separate sections makes the allergens easier to interpret than sometimes requiring reading both.
- 8note 2y agoI would not be surprised if there's peanut butter around that doesn't have any peanuts in it