7 ms·
People have a natural expectation that information used in one place is not re-used in another without being explicitly given. This is especially the case for o
by drucken 14y ago
People have a natural expectation that information used in one place is not re-used in another without being explicitly given. This is especially the case for online-offline interactions.
What next?
- give Amazon or another vendor your credit card, now any Google Images picture with your name and face is your avatar?
- what about the reverse? Say, all public and commercial servcices have access to a sophisticated real-time face-recognition app based on public (or private) Internet services. Every time you enter a cab, a discrete and inexpensive camera, uploads your face and returns a name and some background information. Now the taxi driver asks how you are by your first name and asks would you like to go "Home", "Work" or "School", because from their perspective they are adding customer value?
I can see all sorts of problems and this is just the start...
I would be very surprised this did not violate EU and UK privacy directives if the BA programme is not strictly opt-in, even for the type of high value customers they are targetting.
- antonID 14y agoThis information is public. You put it on the internet. They are not taking pictures of you without your consent, you already uploaded photos of yourself for the world to see. In my eyes, this is not a privacy issue.
- potatolicious 14y agoThis is not a legal issue - as you said, it's public information available freely on the internet. This is more of a "you're creeping everyone the fuck out, stop it" issue.
- lunarscape 14y agoPeople take photos of others all the time without their consent and upload them to public profiles on Facebook.
- orbitingpluto 14y ago"Oh, I see you have an Ashley-Madison profile, would you like to go 'Home', 'Work', 'School', or to your Mistress?"