3 ms·
>jackson's object mapper can easily get stuck or deserialise something incorrectly if the class hasn't been annotated correctly. Why should they be deserialize
by coldtea 2y ago
>jackson's object mapper can easily get stuck or deserialise something incorrectly if the class hasn't been annotated correctly.
Why should they be deserialized as JSON?
- miningape 2y agoThey don't have to be, but if I just want to quickly log an object to inspect it I'd rather not have to chain together a bunch of gets and prints.
- coldtea 2y agoThe Java language should provide an internal serialization of its structures for debug purposes capable of handling nested objects and scalars of any type ... (something like Serializable, but meant for readability, not re-loading the result and also Objects and primitives should get it automatically without declaring it). Neither JSON should be needed, not chaining together gets and prints. I guess one can do it with some reflection...