>Musk still does those things: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blocking_of_Twitter_in_Brazi https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blocking_of_Twitter_in_Brazi... he j

>Musk still does those things: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blocking_of_Twitter_in_Brazi https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blocking_of_Twitter_in_Brazi... he just has to be prodded a bit more (read it affects his wallet) or it has to be in favor of his particular politics https://www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/politics/how-elon-musk-uses https://www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/politics/how-elon-musk-uses.... He doesn't. You didn't link to anything regarding what I explicitly mentioned. How dishonest of you (no surprise there). In fact, I knew someone would have the very same knee-jerk reaction you had and link that wikipedia article or a similar one. Go ahead, downvote me all you want. Silence my post just like Twitter used to do with non-woke standpoints. You won't have provided any real arguments to counter my original post, still. You're pointing to a whole other problem there: complying with court orders. And you can thank Lula for that. >I don’t really understand this absolutist desire for an anonymous town square we can all yell vitriol at each other. That's quite a ridiculous way of caricaturizing free speech. Whenever the truth emerges through the filth, it's "vitriol" and "hate speech" for your delusional lot. Wokeness lost. Own it. Now everyone can see everything for what it is, with no corporate, partisan or governmental censors trying to manipulate reality to fit their abject narrative.